Blog

  • Strasbourg protestors to demand effective action from ECtHR on rights violations in Turkey

     

    A similar protest was held in front of the rights court in June 2022 with the attendance of hundreds of victims of a purge carried out by the Turkish government in the aftermath of a failed coup in Turkey in 2016 as well as activists and EU parliamentarians.

    The ECtHR is accused by victims of human rights violations in Turkey that increased after the coup attempt, when the government launched a crackdown on non-loyalist citizens under the pretext of an anti-coup fight, of not expeditiously processing applications from victims and in some cases of issuing rulings in favor of the Turkish government.

    The protest is being organized by the Peaceful Actions Platform, an umbrella organization comprising 24 civil society groups. The protest will be aired live by MC EU TV and the platform’s YouTube channel.

    In a press statement the Peaceful Actions Platform accused the ECtHR of remaining silent in the face of rights violations in Turkey for the past seven years.

    During the demonstration the protestors will submit a letter to the court’s president, Síofra O’Leary, in which they will ask the court to help the victims of rights violations in Turkey by swiftly concluding their applications.

    Mini concerts by Turkish singers and other activities will take place during the demonstration.

    Following the abortive putsch, the Turkish government declared a state of emergency and carried out a massive purge of state institutions under the pretext of an anti-coup fight. More than 130,000 public servants, including 4,156 judges and prosecutors, as well as 29,444 members of the armed forces were summarily removed from their jobs for alleged membership in or relationships with “terrorist organizations” by emergency decree-laws subject to neither judicial nor parliamentary scrutiny.

    According to a statement from then-Interior Minister Süleyman Soylu on July 5, 2022, a total of 332,884 have been detained, while around 101,000 others have been jailed due to alleged links to the Gülen movement since the failed coup. The minister said there were 19,252 people in Turkey’s prisons at the time who were jailed on alleged links to the movement while 24,000 others were at large.

    In addition to the thousands who were jailed, scores of other Gülen movement followers had to flee Turkey to avoid the government crackdown.

    Some of these people had to take illegal and risky journeys in boats to Greece because their passports had been revoked by the government.

  • Turkey escalates mass detentions in new wave of crackdowns on Gülen movement

    Turkey escalates mass detentions in new wave of crackdowns on Gülen movement

     

    According to the Kronos news website, the İstanbul Public Prosecutor’s Office on Thursday issued detention warrants for 34 former employees of Kaynak Holding, which was seized by the government in November 2015 due to its alleged links to the Gülen movement, a faith-based group accused by the government of “terrorist” activities. The police conducted operations across Turkey and detained 28 of the suspects.

    Turkey’s Savings Deposit Insurance Fund (TMSF) has took over major conglomerates including Kaynak Holding, Naksan Holding, Dumankaya, Boydak Holding and the Koza Ipek Group among 880 other private companies following a coup attempt on July 15, 2016.

    Twelve people including teachers, lawyers and businessmen were also detained on Wednesday in three provinces as part of investigation by the İzmir Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office that also included active duty and dismissed military officers and former military cadets.

    As part of an investigation launched by the Mersin Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, detention warrants were issued on Thursday for 28 former military cadets. Some of them were accused of using ByLock, an encrypted messaging app used on smartphones that used to be available on Apple’s App Store and Google Play. Turkish police detained 23 of the suspects.

    The same day, six people were also detained by security forces in western Turkey as they attempted to flee to Greece.

    President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has been targeting followers of the Gülen movement, inspired by Turkish Muslim cleric Fethullah Gülen, since the corruption investigations of December 17-25, 2013, which implicated then-prime minister Erdoğan, his family members and his inner circle.

    Dismissing the investigations as a Gülenist coup and conspiracy against his government, Erdoğan designated the movement as a terrorist organization and began to target its members. He intensified the crackdown on the movement following an abortive putsch that he accused Gülen of masterminding. Gülen and the movement strongly deny involvement in the coup attempt or any terrorist activity.

    The ByLock messaging app, once widely available online, is considered by the government to be a tool of secret communication among supporters of the movement. The UN Human Rights Council’s Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD) has repeatedly stated that arrest and conviction based on ByLock use in Turkey violated Articles 19, 21 and 22 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

    Following the coup attempt, the Turkish government declared a state of emergency and carried out a massive purge of state institutions under the pretext of an anti-coup fight. More than 130,000 public servants, including 4,156 judges and prosecutors, as well as 24,706 members of the armed forces, were summarily removed from their jobs for alleged membership in or relationships with “terrorist organizations” by emergency decree-laws subject to neither judicial nor parliamentary scrutiny.

    In addition to the thousands who were jailed, scores of other Gülen movement followers had to flee Turkey to avoid the government crackdown.

  • Blind journalist questioned by police for refusing to recognize colleague as ‘terrorist’

    Arat, who had spent two years in jail due to alleged links to the faith-based Gülen movement following a coup attempt in Turkey in 2016, announced on Twitter on Monday that he was questioned by the police due to his remarks about the Gülen movement, journalist Bülent Keneş and President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

     

    The Gülen movement is accused of masterminding the coup attempt on July 15, 2016 and is labelled a terrorist organization by the Turkish government. The movement, inspired by the views of Turkish-Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, strongly denies any involvement in the failed putsch or any terrorist activity.

    Arat was asked about some of his earlier tweets during his interrogation at the Adana Police Department in southern Turkey in which he refused to recognize the Gülen movement and Keneş as terrorists.

    Last year, Turkey’s pro-government Sabah daily and state-run TRT Haber news station targeted Keneş by publishing secretly taken photos of him and broadcasting footage of his home in Stockholm.

    Keneş, an outspoken critic of the Turkish government, gained international attention after Turkey made his extradition a prerequisite for its approval of Sweden’s NATO membership.

    He is among the scores of Turkish journalists who had to flee Turkey following the coup attempt in order to avoid the government crackdown on critical journalists.

  • Students detained over Gülen links questioned about phone contacts, int’l travel history

     

    The students were detained in İstanbul and other cities on June 9 based on the statements of a student identified by the initials B.Ç.

    According to Kronos, the police questioned the detainees regarding their possession of passports and driver’s licenses, their legal or illegal travel history abroad, the reasons behind their travels and their participation in any domestic or international trips organized by the Gülen movement.

    One of the students, identified only by the initials H.D., was reportedly asked about the identity of a person saved on her phone as “Peri.” H.D. stated that Peri was the name of a friend’s deceased cat.

    Kronos said another detainee, identified as Z.D., said she smoked in order to prove that she wasn’t a member of the Gülen movement.

    The students were released after giving statements to the police.

    Turkish authorities last week issued detention warrants for a total of 92 people due to alleged links to the movement as part of investigations launched by the chief public prosecutor’s offices in İstanbul, İzmir, Ankara and Konya provinces. The suspects included lawyers, doctors, nurses, teachers, businessmen, active duty and dismissed military officers and former military cadets.

    President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has been targeting followers of the Gülen movement, inspired by Turkish Muslim cleric Fethullah Gülen, since the corruption investigations of December 17-25, 2013, which implicated then-prime minister Erdoğan, his family members and his inner circle.

    Dismissing the investigations as a Gülenist coup and conspiracy against his government, Erdoğan designated the movement as a terrorist organization and began to target its members. He intensified the crackdown on the movement following an abortive putsch that he accused Gülen of masterminding. Gülen and the movement strongly deny involvement in the coup attempt or any terrorist activity.

    Following the coup attempt, the Turkish government declared a state of emergency and carried out a massive purge of state institutions under the pretext of an anti-coup fight. More than 130,000 public servants, including 4,156 judges and prosecutors, as well as 24,706 members of the armed forces, were summarily removed from their jobs for alleged membership in or relationships with “terrorist organizations” by emergency decree-laws subject to neither judicial nor parliamentary scrutiny.

    In addition to the thousands who were jailed, scores of other Gülen movement followers had to flee Turkey to avoid the government crackdown.  Turkishminute.

  • Turkey violated ex-MP’s freedom of expression over ‘Kurdistan’ reference: ECtHR

    Turkey violated ex-MP’s freedom of expression over ‘Kurdistan’ reference: ECtHR

     

    The application to the court was filed by Osman Baydemir, a former deputy from the pro-Kurdish Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP), who, during budget discussions in the Turkish parliament in 2017, was temporarily excluded from sessions after saying, “As a deputy who comes from Kurdistan, it is my wish that this roof be the common roof of Turks and Kurds.”

    When other deputies shouted and the speaker asked, “Where is Kurdistan?” Baydemir replied by putting his hand on his heart and saying, “Here it is, here it is, the assembly of Kurdistan.”

    In response, the deputy speaker of parliament proposed a temporary exclusion of Baydemir, invoking the rules of procedure that state that no definitions may be made about the administrative structure of the “indivisible unity of Turkey.” Parliament approved the proposal, and Baydemir was excluded from two sessions, and his salary was cut in the amount of 12,000 liras. This was the first time such a punishment was imposed on a lawmaker in parliament.

    Baydemir then appealed to the Constitutional Court, which stated in its ruling that the matter did not fall within its jurisdiction because “a disciplinary penalty is not one of the parliamentary decisions for which the Constitution provides for judicial review.”

    Baydemir then filed an application with the ECtHR.

    In its June 13 judgment, the ECtHR found that Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) on “freedom of expression” had been violated.

    Baydemir has been awarded a total of 16,957 euros, including 9,750 euros in non-pecuniary damages.

    The Turkish bureaucracy and the public remain overly sensitive to the word “Kurdistan” and the tri-colored Kurdistan flag, which in some cases have been associated with “treason and terrorism” linked to the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), listed as a terrorist organization by Turkey and much of the international community.

    More than 40,000 people, including 5,500 security force members, have been killed in four decades of fighting between the Turkish state and the PKK.

    There have been cases of people being arrested for wearing Kurdistan T-shirts, activists detained for waving Kurdistan flags and students interrogated for tweeting pictures of the flag.

    The websites of Turkey’s Presidency and Ministry of Foreign Affairs as well as the state-run Anadolu news agency refer to the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in northern Iraq as Kurdistan.

  • About 5 million Aussies claim work from home expenses but this tax time there are new rules

    About 5 million Aussies claim work from home expenses but this tax time there are new rules

    “We’ve got two methods now in which you can claim your working from home expenses,” says ATO Assistant Commissioner Tim Loh.

    “We’ve got the actual cost method — you need to be able to portion out the private expense versus the work-related expense [and] that method requires really significant records — and the fixed-rate method.”

    It comes as a survey of more than 1,000 Australians from Finder finds that one in eight Australians say their tax refund is “critical” to their financial health and that 36 per cent plan to put their return into savings.

    The research shows around one in seven Australians (15 per cent) say they will be withdrawing their refund to pay for household bills, while 5 per cent say they will be putting it towards their mortgage.

    Here you can claim each expense you have for working from home separately.

    But you need to apportion what’s private and what’s work-related.

    You can claim separately for:

    The other method that is available is the 67 cents per hour revised fixed rate method.

  • Turkey issued detention warrants for 92 people over alleged Gülen links in a week

     

    Detention warrants for 19 people including lawyers, doctors, nurses and teachers were issued on Friday over alleged Gülen links by the İstanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office in western Turkey. Turkish police detained 15 of the suspects.

    In two separate investigations, the Ankara Public Prosecutor’s Office on Tuesday issued detention warrants for 30 individuals including lawyers and former civil servants for alleged links to the Gülen movement. The police launched operations to detain the suspects.

    Nineteen people were also detained on Tuesday in nine provinces after the İzmir Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office issued detention warrants for 23 suspects including active duty and dismissed military officers and former military cadets.

    As part of an investigation launched by the Konya Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, detention warrants were issued on Monday for 19 individuals including businessmen and active duty and former military officers. Some of them were accused of using ByLock, an encrypted messaging app used on smartphones that used to be available on Apple’s App Store and Google Play. Turkish police conducted operations in seven provinces and detained 18 of the suspects.

    President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has been targeting followers of the Gülen movement, inspired by Turkish Muslim cleric Fethullah Gülen, since the corruption investigations of December 17-25, 2013, which implicated then-prime minister Erdoğan, his family members and his inner circle.

    Dismissing the investigations as a Gülenist coup and conspiracy against his government, Erdoğan designated the movement as a terrorist organization and began to target its members. He intensified the crackdown on the movement following an abortive putsch that he accused Gülen of masterminding. Gülen and the movement strongly deny involvement in the coup attempt or any terrorist activity.

    The ByLock messaging app, once widely available online, is considered by the government to be a tool of secret communication among supporters of the movement. The UN Human Rights Council’s Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD) has repeatedly stated that arrest and conviction based on ByLock use in Turkey violated Articles 19, 21 and 22 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

    Following the coup attempt, the Turkish government declared a state of emergency and carried out a massive purge of state institutions under the pretext of an anti-coup fight. More than 130,000 public servants, including 4,156 judges and prosecutors, as well as 24,706 members of the armed forces, were summarily removed from their jobs for alleged membership in or relationships with “terrorist organizations” by emergency decree-laws subject to neither judicial nor parliamentary scrutiny.

    In addition to the thousands who were jailed, scores of other Gülen movement followers had to flee Turkey to avoid the government crackdown.turkishminute.

  • Controversial spy chief takes helm of Turkey’s foreign ministry

     

    Fidan, once a figure in the background with his voice known only to a few, on Monday took over the office from Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu during a handover ceremony held in the courtyard of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs building in Ankara. He stepped into the public spotlight with a speech, standing side-by-side with Çavuşoğlu.

    “After 13 years of service at the National Intelligence Organization, I express my gratitude to President Erdoğan for his trust in me by appointing me to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which carries an equally significant responsibility. … With Mr. Çavuşoğlu, we have successfully carried out critical duties with great harmony and trust,” Fidan said.

    Fidan served as undersecretary of MİT from 2010 to 2023.

    The former spy chief was alleged to be behind the abduction of scores of Turkish dissidents abroad through various methods, with kidnappings and forced renditions being mostly of individuals suspected of links to the faith-based Gülen movement, inspired by the views of Islamic cleric Fethullah Gülen.

    Local mafia groups and intelligence organizations were reportedly employed in the abductions that occurred mainly in African, Balkan and Southeast Asian countries.

    The Gülen movement is labelled as a terrorist organization and accused by the Turkish government of masterminding a failed coup on July 15, 2016, which was suppressed overnight and claimed the lives of 251 people. The movement, which strongly denies involvement in the failed putsch or in any terrorist activity, has been facing an unprecedented crackdown on its members, which escalated after the coup attempt.

    MİT confirmed in its yearly report for 2020 that it had conducted operations for the forcible return of more than 100 people with alleged links to the Gülen movement.

    “… [M]ore than 100 members of the [Gülen movement] from different countries were brought to Turkey as a result of the [agency’s] increased operational capacity abroad,” the report said.

    Although many blamed MİT and Fidan for their failure to prevent the coup attempt by informing the government about it in a timely fashion, Fidan, as well as then-army chief Hulusi Akar, did not appear before a parliamentary inquiry committee regarding the coup attempt and did not testify in court during coup trials.

    This was despite the apparent failure of the Turkish intelligence to gather information about the coup plans. No intelligence official has resigned or been fired by the government, either.

    Among the questions still persisting as to what happened before and after the coup attempt  is why Fidan informed neither Erdoğan nor then-prime minister Binali Yıldırım although it turned out that he had learned about the coup attempt seven hours before they did.

    It was also revealed in 2017 that Akar and Fidan had a six-hour meeting in Ankara a day before the failed coup.

    Following the coup attempt, Fidan’s tenure was also marked by allegations of enforced disappearances of government opponents and their torture at the hands of MİT agents.

    Enforced disappearances, common in Turkey during the 1990s, made a comeback following the coup attempt.

    A recent report from human rights group the Advocates of Silenced Turkey (AST) documented at least 30 instances of enforced disappearance where individuals, largely in Ankara, were whisked away in black transporter vans, in what the report describes as the “Black Transporter” cases. Several victims who were subsequently found reported being tortured during their enforced disappearances, pointing the finger at MİT. Almost all of them were accused of links to the Gülen movement. Some victims who are still missing are feared to have been killed.

    Fidan surprised many when he was heard in an audio clip, the authenticity of which was confirmed by a Turkish court in 2021, suggesting a shocking method to create an excuse for a war on Syria.

    The audio clip dates back to March 13, 2013, when then-foreign minister Ahmet Davutoğlu, then-foreign ministry undersecretary Feridun Sinirlioğlu, then-deputy chief of general staff Gen. Yaşar Güler and Fidan are heard discussing military operations in Syria in Davutoğlu’s Foreign Ministry office.

    Fidan says in the recording: “If needed, I would dispatch four men to Syria. [Then] I would have them fire eight mortar shells at the Turkish side and create an excuse for war.”

    The Turkish government blamed the leak of the audio clip on the Gülen movement, although an investigation failed to provide any evidence to that effect and found nobody from the group who might have been involved in the leak.

    While the opposition accused the government of planning a “provocation” involving Syria that had been exposed on social media, then-prime minister Erdoğan confirmed the security meeting at a public rally in Diyarbakır.

    Instead of questioning the false flag that would drag NATO’s second largest army into a war in Syria, Erdoğan said the wiretapping of his foreign minister’s office was “immoral,” an act of “cowardice,” “dishonest” and “mean.” turkishminute

  • Authorities at Ankara’s Sincan Prison are arbitrarily revoking parole rights of political prisoners

     

    According to prisoners, they are being denied parole for reasons such as “reading too many books,” “consuming too much water,” “meeting with the prison imam” or “attending the open university while in prison.” Inmates’ lawyers said many political prisoners in Sincan Prison had not been released although they had been eligible for parole for several months.

    They explained there was a deliberate move to prevent political prisoners from being released from prison. “This is against the law and completely arbitrary,” said one lawyer. “Many political prisoners who have been incarcerated for a long time are deliberately prevented from being released.”

    Political prisoner Hanım Yıldırım, who was sent to prison more than seven years ago, has not been released despite being eligible for parole for 11 months. According to the prison administration, Yıldırım was not granted parole because she had not expressed regret for her alleged crimes.

    Moreover, she was told she would not be released because her brother had been arrested for alleged links to the Gülen movement, thus violating the principle of the individuality of a crime.

    The Turkish government accuses the faith-based Gülen movement of masterminding a coup attempt on July 15, 2016 and labels it a “terrorist organization,” although the movement strongly denies involvement in the coup attempt or any terrorist activity.

    According to the Turkish Penal Code, people convicted of membership in a terrorist organization are eligible for parole after serving two-thirds of their sentence.

    However, authorities have made it increasingly difficult for political prisoners to benefit from parole by requiring good behavior reports. Prisoners are also required to disclose their political beliefs and repent for their “crimes.” According to lawyers, this contravenes the Turkish Constitution.

    Former mayor of eastern Agri province Mukaddes Kubilay, who is currently incarcerated in Sincan Prison, was also not granted parole because she did not renounce her political views. She said she would never express any kind of regret for her beliefs and refused to have it used as a bargaining chip for her freedom.

    Zeynep Han Bingöl, 62, who was sentenced to seven years, six months in prison, said this practice was against good conscience and in violation of the law. She said there were several young Kurdish women in the prison who were not granted parole because of their political views.

    Another woman, Rojda Erez, who is also eligible for parole, has not been released for months because the prison administration confused her file with that of another inmate. The administration told Erez that she had killed her husband 15 years ago and that her release was delayed because she might hurt someone else. Erez, however, has never been married and is imprisoned for political reasons. When she pointed this out, the administration said it was a mistake but that she had consumed a lot of water during her time in prison so it was decided to keep her for a while as a disciplinary punishment.

    To legitimize the suspension of parole, prison authorities launch disciplinary investigations into political prisoners and issue them bad behavior reports. Good behavior reports are key for a prisoner to be eligible for parole.

    Opposition politicians have repeatedly criticized prison authorities for arbitrarily revoking parole rights; however, despite their outrage the authorities have continued the practice.Stockholm Center for Freedom

  • Widespread imprisonment of individuals with alleged Gülen links may constitute crimes against humanity:UN working group

    Widespread imprisonment of individuals with alleged Gülen links may constitute crimes against humanity:UN working group

     

    The case in question concerned Muhammet Şentürk, arrested and convicted of membership in a terrorist organization due to his alleged links to the Gülen movement, a faith-based group accused by the government of “terrorist” activities.

    “It expresses grave concern about the pattern that all these cases follow and recalls that, under certain circumstances, widespread or systematic imprisonment or other severe deprivation of liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law may constitute crimes against humanity,” the UN working group said.

    WGAD urged the Turkish government to ensure a full and independent investigation of the circumstances surrounding the detention and to take appropriate measures against those responsible for the violation of their rights.

    Professor Şentürk was arrested on November 11, 2016, by officers from the counterterrorism unit of the Istanbul Police Department, on the basis of a warrant issued by the Karaman Public Prosecutor’s Office. After spending two days in custody at Pendik district police headquarters, he was taken to Karaman province, 800 kilometers away, in a police car. He was sentenced to six years, eight months’ imprisonment in March, 2018. The charges against him were based on membership in the Karaman Academic Youth Association, his alleged use of the ByLock application, taking part in a Gülen movement student organization, meeting with military cadets and having a bank account at Bank Asya, a Gülen movement-affiliated financial institution that at one time was one of Turkey’s biggest commercial banks.

    “The deprivation of liberty of Muhammet Şentürk, being in contravention of articles 2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 11 (1), 19 and 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and articles 2 (1), 9 (3), 14 (3) (e), 19, 21 and 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, is arbitrary and falls within categories I, II, III and V,” the working group said.

    Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has been targeting followers of the Gülen movement since the corruption investigations of December 17-25, 2013, which implicated then-Prime Minister Erdoğan, his family members and his inner circle.

    Dismissing the investigations as a Gülenist coup and conspiracy against his government, Erdoğan designated the movement as a terrorist organization and began to target its members. He intensified the crackdown on the movement following a coup attempt on July 15, 2016 that he accused Gülen of masterminding. Gülen and the movement strongly deny involvement in the abortive putsch or any terrorist activity.

    In response to the allegations about the victim, the Turkish government gave no details concerning the specific situation of the individuals in question but provided its views on the Gülen movement. According to WGAD’s opinions, in both cases the Turkish government claimed that the movement “is now employing the strategy of presenting itself as the victim of human rights violations to hide its crimes.”

    Instead of responding to allegations the Turkish government requested “the special procedures of the Human Rights Council, including the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, not to allow the Fethullahist terrorist organization and its members to abuse those mechanisms, and to dismiss their allegations.”

    The working group said it treats all submissions made to it equally and accepts them as allegations, inviting the government concerned to respond. “The onus is therefore on the Government to engage with the Working Group constructively by addressing the specific allegations made to assist the Working Group in reaching a conclusion in each communication brought to its attention,” WGAD said.

    The working group observed that in the present case, as in many others, the essence of the allegations of alliance with the Gülen movement was based on such regular daily activities. “Nothing in the materials before it allows the Working Group to conclude that these activities can be regarded as capable of generating a reasonable suspicion that he had committed the alleged criminal offences,” the working group said.

    Similarly, the working group said no evidence has been presented that “the activities of the petitioner, described above, could have been equated with being engaged in any terrorism-related activity.” turkishminute